Last Friday, we visited Winterton-on-Sea, and completed a
transect from the beach to approximately 300m inland. We used a quadrat to
record a variety of aspects measuring the biodiversity, including the number of
species in each quadrat at each site.
When we moved forward to the sample point, Jemima (my partner in the investigation) would just throw the quadrat
randomly to avoid biased placing of the quadrat. We then counted the number of
species in the quadrat – this was rushed as we had very limited time so was not
very accurate and we had to try and count them and then make an educated guess.
This is not the most accurate way of measuring but it allowed us to gather
enough data to make suggestions about the diversity of the habitat.
The graph shows a rapid initial increase, then a fairly
random distribution of data. The initial increase was possibly due to there being more nutrients in the soil as we moved inland, and the conditions
became less harsh as it was more sheltered from the shoreline conditions. It is
sheltered by the concrete wall that is built along the coast – this is now
covered in land so is not visible, rather, it just looks like a small hill. The soil
on top of the concrete wall would have a different salinity level and so this
may have affected the number of species present and may explain the decrease
between sample points 13 and 17. If we had more time, we could have possibly
recorded height of sample point above sea level, which is very difficult to
measure accurately, and impossibly with the time constraints we had. We could
have also measured the pH of the soil and looked at the effect this had, as the
pH does decrease further inland. If these constraints weren’t in place I
would also identify all the species that are present as then the number of
species recorded is a more accurate measurement, rather than just make an
estimate.
Also, to gather a bigger sample size, I would do several transects,
possibly three about 15 m apart to get a better idea of the diversity of the
whole area. Although we did several transects amongst us as a group and this
allowed us to discuss the findings, due to differences in sampling strategies
there was great differences in the data. Also, there is the question of which
measure of diversity is the best, as it may not be possible to record all in a
proper investigation. It is questionable if number of species is the best
measurement of species diversity, some may argue that percentage of bare land
is a better measure.
We then collected a small amount of data which shows how the
number of lichens changes with distance from footpath, to investigate the
effect of humans trampling in the dune system. There were many factors to
consider when doing this, such as:
- How far away from the path should we measure?
- Should we measure the same distance from the path each time,
or do we alter the distance in comparison to width of path? Does this assume
people walk off the path more if the path is wider?
- How do you class where the path ends? If using the level of
trampling, is a trampling index needed? Do you need to measure the height of
the vegetation each time to classify the level of trampling?
- How many paths do you need to measure to get a good sample
size?
- Do you need to measure the percentage coverage in each square
in the quadrat, to get an idea of how the lichen cover changes over an area or
is just using the whole quadrat good enough? But then does this miss out all
this information of how the lichen cover gradually changes?
Clearly, it is very difficult to take all these factors into
consideration, especially with no prior planning. Although we did not get very
much data on lichen coverage due to the fact that we were thinking about all these factors for so
long, we did see a difference in the lichen being present off path, whereas on
the paths there was none. To conserve this, you could have fewer defined paths,
with small barriers either side of the path, or even just pieces of wood to
indicate where the paths are, to put people off going off the paths and
disturbing the vegetation away from the paths. As lichens are very easily
disturbed, this would help increase lichen coverage. You could also have fences
to prevent people going on certain areas completely, particularly areas that
have been trampled on excessively, and allow them to recover as succession
occurs. Information boards could also be placed on these pathways to educate
people about why the dune systems need to be conserved, and to highlight the
importance of limiting the effect that recreation activities have on the area.